Appalachia Project: The Dollmaker, 1954

The Dollmaker, by Harriette Arnow

It's a sprawling book--an epic, though it covers barely a year (1944-45) and only a few hundred miles. The heroine, Gertie Nevels, travels farther in that year than an astronaut going to the moon and makes adjustments that took nations a century. Gertie starts out in an agrarian life little changed from that of her Revolutionary War ancestors--she follows the seasons and the needs of the crops and livestock. She spends most of her time outdoors and has little contact with any people outside her own family. Gertie is a success in agrarian terms. She can birth a calf, plow straight, plant at the right times, mend harness, sew, churn butter, and whittle. She is congruent with her world.

The Dollmaker takes place against a backdrop of World War II. The war takes all the men away from her community. This disruption in the life of subsistence farming is dramatic and leads to the eventual depopulation of Appalachia. Waiting for news becomes the focus of the women left behind. Gertie's husband must choose between evils--the army or the factory. He chooses the factory, which is better for his family. The irony of this decision drips through the book, as his family suffers.

More people came down the lane: children running, women with babies in their arms walking tiredly, old women like Sue Annie, hurrying, with no wind left for gossiping. They would see her and forget the old greetings of other days like, "How's your mother a holden up, Gertie?" or, "Law, law, it's been a time an a time since I've seen you. When are you a comen to stay all day?" Instead, they all, young and old, asked with breathless abruptness, "Has the mail got in?" (pages 151-152)

In the course of a day, Gertie's world rocks on it foundations. She follows her husband to Detroit, Michigan, where he has taken a job in a steel mill in lieu of going into the army. She moves into ticky-tacky cheek-by-jowl worker housing in a filthy neighborhood next to the factories and an extensive network of railroad tracks. Noise, light, smoke, traffic, yelling, neighbors arguing on the other side of paper thin walls--these assault Gertie, a cacophony of ugliness.

She had never lived with a clock since leaving her mother's house, and even there the cuckoo clock had seemed more ornament than a god measuring time; for in her mother's house, as in her own, time had been shaped by the needs of the land and the animals swinging through the seasons. She would sit, the knife half forgotten in her hands, and listen to the seconds ticking by, and the clock would become the voice of the thing that had jerked Henley from the land, put Clovis in Detroit, and now pushed her through days where her work, her meals, and her sleep were bossed by the ticking voice. (page 210)

The steamy, nasty smell of the drying, half rotten reused wool mingled with the gas smell, the chlorine water smell, the supper-getting smell, and became one smell, a stink telling her it was the time of day she had learned to hate most. The time she had loved back home, the ending when the day was below her. (page 265)

It took Great Britain and North America more than 100 years to accomplish what Gertie did in a few weeks--obliterate the agrarian and adjust to the mechanical. Gertie's experience reminds me of tales of isolated villages in the Amazon basin who come into contact with modernity for the first time. We like to see them as amazed, but, like Gertie, they might just be horrified.

The Dollmaker can be viewed from so many different angles that I actually have a list--and it is about 25 items long. One of the key perspectives is the immigrant experience. The work force in Detroit comes from around the world and many of the people have no point of reference for city life. People from the Appalachian region were doubly alienated--as clueless as any immigrant but without the expectation of strangeness. Gertie had no reference point for the environment she moved to and was disoriented by how badly the new environment completely unmet her expectations. Many of her expectations were form from primary grade readers her children got from school back home--happy, helpful policemen; pretty streets with rows of trees; nice manicured yards around every house; sidewalks.

The real butter, that was to have been a Christmas treat with hot biscuit, had got so hard and cold from its stay in the Icy Heart (fridge) that it refused to melt even on the hottest of the biscuit, and butter and biscuit were chilled together. Clytie (oldest daughter) had put the lettuce in the wrong place, and it was frozen. Reuben (son) complained the milk was so cold it hurt his teeth. Clytie blamed it on Enoch (another son), who'd turned down the cold controls; Enoch was angry; and Clovis (husband) turned sorrowful because the Icy Heart, like Cassie's new doll and the other things he'd bought, was unappreciated. (page 288)

I have also heard that at times in the past quarantine of Appalachian peoples onto reservations was considered. Surely, the population of the region is dwindling due to substance abuse, poor medical care, and economic hardship--some of the same conditions prevalent on Indian reservations. I'm fascinated by this kind of observation. I see myself as part of a fragile population and fragile culture, both of which are at risk of winking out.

I certainly remember feeling like a foreigner as a freshman at Ohio State in 1977. I had never knowingly met a Jew or a Catholic. The pace was whoosh-whoosh-whoosh. And I was pretty intrepid...just kept pushing until I understood...lots of observation before action...but I still never felt a part of the place. Always felt a bit like a visitor, a student from another country who could be educated but not particularly enculturated.

...She had wasted Clovis's money for rotten bananas and poor meat and all the other things they didn't know about--the box of pepper half full, the rotten eggs, the rotten oranges, the sweet potatoes bought as a treat one night but all black in their hearts, yet showing no sign from the outside...She gripped the door handle. She could raise bushels of sweet potatoes, fatten a pig, kill it, and make good sausage meat, but she didn't know how to buy. She could born a fine and laughing boy baby and make him grow up big and strong, but inside him all his laughter died. (page 350)

The Dollmaker is a slowish read. I was distracted at first by Arnow's dialect spelling. She used "u" for the article "a" and in the word "to." The "u" stood for the sound "uh." She also used "th" for "the." Once I got used to it, I found that it represented the sound of the speech quite well--and certainly with less difficulty than Twain's excessive use of apostrophes. For non-Appalachian readers, Gertie's word use might be difficult. "If we'd ha stayed, I could ha hoped Grandpa with them yoes." If we'd have stayed, I could have helped Grandpa with the ewes."

I've heard Appalachian speech most of my life and can pop out with a good one every now and then to this day. I just have to channel my grandparents and aunts and uncles. My mom got trained in "proper" speech and struggled to sound "right." From her I got a grounding in standard speech. Speaking proper has always been a help (holp) to me. If I had sounded Appalachian when I went to Ohio State my experience might have been very different.

In addition to speaking a different dialect, Gertie also suffered from being taciturn--she was not talkative. She struggled to find words for objects and phenomena she had not conceived of before moving to Detroit. She struggled just like any other non-English-speaking person. I remember feeling that way when I went to Germany. Even the German words I knew were hard to produce. I just couldn't get them out.

Mrs. Anderson opened the door, but Gertie turned quickly about and started down the steps. If she could walk now, walk all night, walk and walk, forever; if she had corn to gather, like for Henley, even a cow to milk, some gentle cow that would let her lean her forehead...Clytie and Enoch, who had been listening to the radio, sprang up. Clytie started toward her but stopped in the doorway and stared at her, then slowly backed away, her mouth open, her eyes wide, unable to leave the twisted, soot and blood-streaked face that seemed not a face at all, more like a mask such as children wear at Hallowe'en to frighten other children: and out of it blazed the eyes that from being gray and forever calm were black now, glittering, fighting all things, even [her] children. (pages 413-414)

Gertie spoke most eloquently with her hands and a knife. She carved wood, or whittled, as she called it. Whittling, though, as a connotation of frittering, killing time; whereas Gertie was a gifted artist in wood. She had a log of straight-grained cherry, maybe 18 inches tall and 18 inches across. Somehow, in spite of working 18-hour days, she found time to work on this log--to make an image of Jesus. Or was it Judas? She wasn't sure whose face would emerge from the wood. At the start of the book, only the top of the head has been carved. By the end of the book, the statue is complete except for the face. The insights Gertie gains from working on this piece of wood are the crux of the story. Images of Jesus include a vision of a laughing Jesus that came to Gertie right before her rural life ended; a shrunken and suffering Jesus on the cross on the crucifixes she saw in her Detroit neighbors' homes (she had never seen a crucifix); and various other bland and sober depictions.

Gertie's theology was mostly of her own making. She was notorious in her Kentucky county because she did not go to church, rejecting the hellfire and damnation theology preached there. She saw so much beauty and wonder and grimness and death in her wandering through her world; she formed her own beliefs of a loving, laughing Jesus from her own experiences. Gertie's main question about Judas was whether he was or should be forgiven by Jesus. He had no idea that his action would bring about such dire consequences. And he tried to give the 30 pieces of silver back. Gertie knew that she was a sinner also. Would she be forgiven?

She missed him, but could never tell him how she missed him most. She hated herself when she lied, trying to make herself believe she missed him the way a mother ought to miss a child. In the old song ballads mothers cried, looking at tables with empty plates and rooms with empty beds. But how could a body weep over a table where, even with one gone, there was yet hardly room for those remaining. The gas pipes were still overcrowded with drying clothes; and eight quarts of milk instead of ten in the Icy Heart meant only less crowding, not vacant space. Two pounds of hamburger cost less than two and a half and-- She would hate herself for thinking of the money saved, and try never to think that living was easier with no child sleeping in the little living room. (page 369)

Gertie's statue of Jesus shows that he is holding something. Is he taking it? Is he giving it back? Is it running through his fingers? What is it? The answer Gertie recieves forms the final apotheosis of the book. It was an answer I didn't understand when I read this book 30 years ago. My new understanding did not lessen the impact of the act. It was consistent with Gertie's inner understanding.

The Dollmaker can be seen from the "noble savage" perspective--the idea that "primitive" people have something that we evolved people have lost. I've seen many versions of this-that being closer to nature give you special insights when it often only gives you rickets, lice, lung cancer, and ignorance. Gertie is smart and insightful because she was smart and insightful to begin with. She has those gifts whether she is in the Eden of Kentucky or the Hell of Detroit. In each place, there was a range of abilities in the population. And, truly, Gertie's isolated world hurt her in her attempts to understand urban life. She agonized over so many mistakes, knew that her big boots and unstyled hair and unpainted face scared the people she met.

...it seemed so long ago that she had felt as that woman felt now--going to a place that would be paradise. Paradise: it was a pretty word. She'd never thought how pretty it was until now. When the woman spoke it in her soft rich voice, it made her think of peaches, pure gold on one side, red in the gold on the other, soft, juicy, warm in the August sun, warm-tasting like the smell of the muscadines above the river in October. "It's a pretty name," and remembering, twisting the hurt inside her, she said to the woman what she had said to herself, "'This day thou shalt be with me in paradise.'" The woman laughed. "That's what mah man said to me, only in different words." Gertie nodded, and her voice was defiant. "I'll allus think that a body oughtn't tu have tu die first to git it--that is, at least for a little--a paradise on earth."

Leaving Eden. Going among the world. Making a supreme sacrifice. Gertie's story parallels that of Jesus. Arnow uses the imaginary friend of Gertie's youngest daughter, Cassie, to deepen this theme. Cassie and her "friend" Callie Lou are best friends and go everywhere together and process Cassie's experiences together. To Gertie, this is for the most part harmless. But in Detroit, it is seen as crazy and odd. Gertie knows she should help Cassie adjust (a loaded word in this book) by, as she sees it, killing off Callie Lou. She must force Cassie to give up her own version of the laughing Jesus. The consequences of this action are heart breaking.

I've heard this book labeled as feminist, but I don't see it that way. Certainly, it could be used to support many discussions about the role of women and the issue of powerlessness. Gertie felt that her husband had the right to control the direction of the family and that's how it went. That's how she ended up in Detroit. But she didn't struggle against it. You can also see this book as reflecting women's tendency to build community. The women in the factory housing formed a supportive group--they took care of each other's children and tended to sicknesses and grief. This is another of the themes for Appalachian literature that I am tracking. Real life is centered in the women. Only in this way does Gertie's Detroit neighborhood resemble "back home."

And, there is beauty in the filthy and crowded Detroit slum. It is in the faces of the children and the kindness of the people to each other. Even those who wish to remain apart end up as participants in the life of the alley. As Gertie's painter neighbor observes:

"Always I hated it, this alley, the ugliness, the noise--there wasn't time or quiet in which to paint--and of course nothing to paint. I never saw them--the pictures; Wheateye [little girl] standing on the coalshed roof with a popsicle in her hand...strange, I never saw her then, but I do now; dirty with popsicle juice dribbling down her chin; there'd be flies buzzing round, and the gray houses and the dirty trash cans, always spilling, and the back steelmill smoke, but there she would stand on the coalhouse looking up at the clean, silvery airplanes...But I never saw her." (pages 440-441)

The Dollmaker is a book of great poverty that leaves me with great riches and a window through which to view my own heritage. My family, too, left the Eden of Appalachia, although it was more of an escape to them than an expulsion. We were a bit on the outside, which was a gift and a curse. I know my sense of not belonging has contributed much to my abilities as a writer. Knowing Gertie helps me love relatives long dead now who I did not understand as a child. Strange Aunt Hazel. Odd Cousin Robert. My dad's brother Jim. My grandpa Homer Burton. Even my beloved Aunt Mabel and Uncle Melvin (still living, thank goodness!), who managed to stay on the land at some cost.

You know me and endings. Well, the ending of The Dollmaker was great. I don't mean happy. I mean that Arnow saw the ending, wrote it, and stopped. She left it in our hands as it was. Now I have to carry that act of Gertie's as part of me. I am changed by it. That's a magnificent ending.

Among the Ruins of the Kingdom, by Douglas Hatten

A new entry in the fantasy tradition, Among the Ruins of the Kingdom, by Douglas Hatten, is fast-paced and engaging. Although it started a bit slow, I was hooked by about page 50 and after about page 150 I could not put the book down. Hatten is the cousin of my friend Maryjane Ferguson, a disclaimer that means little in terms of this review. If I had disliked the book I simply would not have reviewed it...so I'm happy to recommend this book to you. It's a touchy thing to review a book by someone you have a connection to. I admit that my tendency is to sheath my claws a bit. Enjoy!

The author, Douglas Hatten

Among the Ruins follows a standard quest format--a teenage boy is selected and identified as the champion of good versus evil. He undergoes numerous trials and contests and gathers allies and magical objects. He gains power and skill as he goes along. This is an entirely predictable formula, repeated again and again in all genres of literature and in uncounted movies and video games. Yet, it works. It still works, even when I know exactly what's going on and even when I am certain of the outcome (the hero prevails). The quest format is a comfortable template upon which to build a story and allows the reader to focus on themes and characters.

I pictured Chayim as a young
Leonard DiCaprio

In Among the Ruins, just-turned-17-year-old Chayim is forcibly diverted from his life as a peasant-scholar. His parents were told to send him for schooling because of a prophecy. Among his family and teachers, only Chayim did not know that he had a special destiny. Seventeen is the age of adulthood in Chayim's culture and his adventure starts right on his birthday--a nice touch. On his way home from school, Chayim is stalked by a shadow being and is rescued by a wizened old man who carries a walking stick--the Gandalf character. I don't think Hatten stole the idea of Gandalf from Tolkien--I just think that the wise old teacher is a fixture in quest literature. Tolkien got his Gandalf from a much older tradition.

Here's my favorite cinematic Jesus--Ted Neely
from Jesus Christ: Superstar. What might Jesus
have accomplished with a good mentor like
Gandalf?

ASIDE: It is peculiar that the ultimate quest/savior, Jesus, did not have a mentor...or his mentor was lost in the retelling. So much of quest literature is based in Christianity...somehow the mentor character survived his/her exclusion from the Christian story. The disciples were clearly subordinate to Jesus, not advisers or teachers. I'm not a Christian scholar...are there versions of the Jesus story that indicate a mentor? In a sense, I guess his dad was his mentor, except maybe without a walking stick. Please comment if you have feedback on this.

Aragorn had a romance--and a hot French
kiss you can see if you watch the scene in
super slow-mo. Lucky couple!

Anyway, when the mentor, Zidek, rescues Chayim, the adventure begins. Chayim, with the help of various friends and powers, must somehow collect the armor of a great king, which will allow him to prevail in a great battle between good and evil...and bring back the great king (a reference to the second coming of Jesus?) and a time of peace. I will not go into the plot here--don't want to risk any spoilers--but danger, courage, discouragement, betrayal, violence, victory, and love are a part of it. We watch as Chayim grows into his hero role. And, a romance is provided for him, which makes him a tad luckier than Jesus and Frodo!

A thick forest is one of the memorable locations
of Among the Ruins

Hatten presents a coherent worldview for his fantasy--a set of sacred texts, spiritual practices, initiates and intiators. The history of the kingdom is fully present in the present, which is a nice thing. As a reader, I had a strong sense of Chayim's heritage and traditions. This increased the plausibility of the book. The sensory detail was sparse--a polar opposite from Tolkien--and yet I had a physical sense of place. And certainly after Chapter 1, I was fully engaged in this world and retain it as a place I have visited.

The main philosophical question in Among the Ruins seemed to be the conflict between predestination and free will. The author worked hard to reconcile these two ideas...repeatedly and often. Several times, Chayim questions his role in the drama...does his free will mean anything at all in the face of living out a prophecy that was written millenia ago? The issue is not resolved to my satisfaction, but then I am a free will sort of person. I don't believe that "it is written" until I've written it.

My favorite scenes were those in which Chayim felt the pull of the power of creation. In a Joseph Campbell sense, he was open to allurement and followed its energy. Anyway, when the pull started, I knew something amazing was going to happen--an amazing dragon, a display of superhuman powers, some sort of magic. I loved that. And I loved the idea of ancient portals--short cuts--that would open if Chayim would synchronize with the power.

My main problem with this book is that it could use a good copy edit. I'm pretty fussy about grammar and spelling and usage and such, and maybe I'm just old-fashioned. But one of the reasons I would like a major publisher to pick up and publish this terrific book is that they would give it a serious structural edit and a copy edit. I came across "parameter" used for "perimeter" (twice!), and "its/it's" used improperly, and "suites" used for "suits,"  and many other bits of carelessness. I think a good editor would also pep up the opening chapters of the book and jump the reader right into the action.

I will be buying book two of this series probably today. Why don't you go and buy book 1? You'll find it for sale at:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/douglas-hatten/among-the-ruins-of-the-kingdom/paperback/product-18837230.html

The Bronze Bow, by Elizabeth George Speare

A mountain in Galilee overlooking farmland. Much of The Bronze Bow takes place in this setting.

When I think about The Bronze Bow, by Elizabeth George Speare, I don't think of reading it. I think of living it. I was right there with the hero Daniel on the mountain above his village in Galilee, in the blacksmith forge in the village, and in the presence of Jesus, who is a character in this book. I had no consciousness of reading or of the writing. The writing dissolved into an experience of Daniel's journey into adulthood. The Bronze Bow is a hero journey--Daniel starts out as an angry adolescent, alienated, in hiding. As is typical of a hero journey, he undergoes trials and temptations, gains tools for his quest, and transforms into a strong man of love and understanding.

Here's Jeffrey Hunter as Jesus with his strangely
glowing gentile blue eyes. From King of Kings.

The book takes place at the time Jesus was preaching in Galilee--shortly before his journey to Jerusalem. As in Ben-Hur, a book also reviewed in this blog, the Jews of the time were looking for an earthly king to lead them in overthrowing their Roman occupiers. One of Daniel's friends is a Zealot named Simon, who has made it his mission bring freedom to the land. After fleeing his village, Daniel is befriended by another band of rebels led by the warlord-esque Rosh, who lives off the land (meaning he pillages the local farms and fields). Daniel believes that Rosh will be the one who throws off the Roman yoke.

The most important gift of Daniel's hero journey is a set of friends--Joel and Thacia. For the first time, Daniel has someone with which to share his hopes, his dreams, and his story. Daniel's life has been harsh, filled with violence, losses, and poverty. The camp of Rosh seems like luxury to him--plenty of food, a warm fire, a mission to perform. Joel and Thacia enlarge Daniel's view of the world and bring him face to face with some of his prejudices.

In addition to playing Jesus in King of
Kings, Jeffrey Hunter played an equally
intense James T. Kirk in the pilot episode
of Star Trek. Those limpid eyes!

Daniel's friend Simon invites Daniel to hear Jesus preach at the local synagogue. Jesus is somewhat romantically presented, like the Jesus portrayed by Jeffrey Hunter in the movie King of Kings. Even the camera seems to have its breath taken away whenever Jesus is shown in that film. In The Bronze Bow, Jesus has a magnetism about him, and a magical voice, and a huge amount of somewhat fevered charisma. In other words, he is not portrayed as a man, but as an already-god. As with Ben-Hur, Daniel wishes Jesus would use his powers to call together an army and to establish an earthly kingdom. Like Ben-Hur, Daniel must come to terms with the idea of a heavenly kingdom, a kingdom of the heart and soul.

I think Daniel's conversion is somewhat elided. It doesn't make logical sense in terms of the story. It sort of happens because it is supposed to happen, because if you meet Jesus it must happen. And, I know that religious conversion is not necessarily logical, but a novel must play itself out in certain ways and this one doesn't. However, that is the only flaw I find in this book, and less critical readers will probably be OK with Daniel's change of heart. And I was glad for it. He was so miserable. Still, how would his situation have been resolved in a purely Jewish context? People from all faith traditions deal with developmental crises. I guess it bothers me a little bit that the only solution presented for Daniel was Jesus. I worry that Christian writers don't fully take into account the seriousness and cultural dissonance of a conversion of a Jew to Christianity. It makes me a little queasy.

Daniel's sister is a weaver. The weaving seems to be her
way to bring order to her disordered psyche.

The book is deeply humanized by the character of Daniel's sister Leah. Her response to the losses and violence was withdrawal rather than anger. Over the course of the book, she is brought out, drawn out, by Daniel, by Thacia, by a Roman soldier, and eventually by Jesus, who cures her of her maladies. Her gradual reaching out into the world is beautifully drawn; and Daniel's relationship to her illuminates him also.

The Bronze Bow is a book rich with love and the conflicts that love sometimes brings about. How much sacrifice is too much sacrifice? How does being true to oneself relate to sacrifice? When is love not enough? What is healing? What is a commitment? These are big questions and they are addressed in this book. They are the questions of fine literature and so are appropriate to this fine book. I am still amazed that the writing in this book sort of disappeared in the experience it was describing. That's a huge accomplishment and I salute Elizabeth George Speare for it.

I have a few more books by Speare on my list. I'm very interested now in how they will strike me. Is the transparency of Speare's writing particular to The Bronze Bow? I can't wait to find out.

Ben-Hur, by Lew Wallace

This is the 1925 Ben-Hur.

Ben-Hur, by Lew Wallace (1880) is an odd duck of a book to be on my Eager Readers list, or so it seemed before I read it. But, it truly is a great story, told with currency and urgency and authenticity. I felt like I was right there with Ben-Hur in Jerusalem, in Antioch, in the stands at the chariot race. All in all, it was masterful story telling. And, it made no bones about being a Christian story, so it could be taken on its own terms. The book Ben-Hur is more concise than the movie, tighter, with less melodrama. Ben-Hur is much younger than the Heston portrayal. The main action is Ben-Hur’s vengeance and quest for his family. Everything is presented in that context.

Judah Ben-Hur is a young Jewish prince living in Jerusalem who is wrongly accused of an attack on a Roman official. His punishment is to row in the Roman galleys as a slave; his family and fortune are busted up. His childhood friend, Messala, is in league with the barely wounded procurator to steal everything the Ben-Hur family ever had. In a magnificent battle scene, Ben-Hur rescues a Roman general and is thereby rescued himself from slavery. He gains wealth and status from this adopted father.

Heston in Ben-Hur 1959, rowing in the galleys

Still, he cannot rest. He must find out what happened to his mother and sister. This quest ennobles Ben-Hur and is a story arc equal to and as important as Ben-Hur’s connection with “the Nazarene,” as they call the imminent Christ.

The story of Jesus is the second story arc. The reader travels with the Wise Men as they find and worship the Christ child. The two arcs are parallel—finding Jesus is sort of like finding your lost family, in the terms of this book; both are ways to find that elusive ideal called Home. And the one journey being concrete while the other is spiritual works very nicely. Ben-Hur and the remaining wise man (Balthasar) are present at the crucifixion, during which Ben-Hur is profoundly changed (and Balthasar is taken directly into heaven with Jesus). This transformation then enables Ben-Hur's earthly happiness, as it makes him acceptable to his childhood love, Miriam. The teachings of Jesus also erase the class differences between them and they are portrayed as living "happily ever after."

The portrayal of the Jewish struggle against Roman domination is a primary theme. Ben-Hur and his friends want a worldly king with armies and power. The desire to overthrow Rome is noble and necessary. They are courageous in their fight for freedom. But the Jews are also presented as having Jesus’s blood on them—they betrayed him to the Romans when he wasn’t the earthly king they wanted. Wallace curses all Jews for all time for betraying Jesus, an accusation that I do not find justified.

The book is a good read, interesting, engaging. Several sequences are riveting—the battle scene during which Ben-Hur escapes the galleys, the chariot race, the transformation of Ben-Hur’s mother and sister. I held my breath through the chariot race, even though I knew exactly how it turned out. I was impressed by how detailed it was—I really felt like I was there. And I wept with Mother and Tirzah as they were healed.

The 1959 film never showed Jesus' face--you
came to know him by the expression on Ben-
Hur's face--a wonderful film-making decision.

And, the story of Jesus is much stronger when seen through the eyes of Ben-Hur than it is when presented directly. Ben-Hur filters it and represents us in skepticism, wonder, and, finally, faith. What a masterful idea Wallace had to write the book in this way.

So, this book was great stuff. I remember liking it when I read it decades ago. And it has held up well. It’s a story of adventure, revenge, redemption, and love. And, it’s a story about an adult emerging from the turmoil of of a child's point of view. I highly recommend it.

Sidebar: Ben-Hur and the Hero Journey

This diagram is based on the work of Joseph Campbell.

If you've followed my blog, you know that tracing the role of the hero quest in the literature I'm reading is an underlying theme. I watch out for it because it is specified by Joseph Campbell (one of my personal heroes) as found in the stories and literature of almost every culture. How does a person grow up? The hero quest stories present the journey for us, demonstrating the pitfalls, dangers, diversions, and the great rewards of taking the path to enlightenment/full adulthood. Ben-Hur loses himself--his name and home are stripped from  him. He doesn't even own himself, as a galley slave. The book presents his struggle to find himself--by finding his courage, his cause, his family, his salvation. He acquires tools and gifts that he uses to complete his quest. What video game could want more? Christian game designers, what are you waiting for? This hero journey is ripe for the picking.

Sidebar: Lew Wallace

I love this quote by Lew Wallace--it's my dream, too. I found it at http://thinkexist.com/quotes/lew_wallace/.

"I know what I should love to do--to build a study; to write, and to think of nothing else. I want to bury myself in a den of books. I want to saturate myself with the elements of which they are made, and breathe their atmosphere until I am of it. Not a bookworm, being which is to give off no utterances; but a man in the world of writing--one with a pen that shall stop men to listen to it, whether they wish to or not."

The following link presents a brief history of Wallace's military career. He was a man of action as well as a writer. (I don't know why I don't think those things go together!): 

http://www.civilwarhome.com/wallacebio.htm