Pop-Tarts for the Older Person, by Joy Dickerson

The people who make Pop-Tarts are missing the key market for Pop-Tarts: the aging...the middle-aged...people like me. We eat Pop-Tarts. We love them. We stray to generic brands but always return shame-faced to the mother ship of toaster pastries. In my mind, Pop-Tarts are just about the perfect food. Sweet, safe, digestible, and easy to prepare--that's a lot of value for your money. (And, for you thrill seekers, remember that Pop-Tarts are potentially flammable if toasted on a setting higher than "uncooked.") (No, young people, don't try this at home--I'm warning you.)

Speaking of young people (even parenthetically), that's the target market, apparently, for Pop-Tarts. The flavors used to be pretty standard: strawberry, grape, and the ultimate favorite brown-sugar cinnamon. I remember when icing was added. It was revolutionary. We had to try it. Sweeter, safer, more digestible (and probably more flammable). But now the flavors are getting pretty wild--tutti-frutti, s'mores, watermelon, exotic swirls in garish colors. The give-aways (don't you save your proof-of-purchases?) are totally tween oriented.

This juvie marketing has a desperate tinge to it...youth are insatiable for the new. Remember when suckers were just suckers? And then they put tootsie rolls in the middle--an amazing innovation--and then bubble gum in the middle--it got out of hand pretty quick. (Although, whoever invented ring-pops was a true genius.) Candy on a string, however, never quite made it into the advertising age--and remember those candy pills on a strip of paper...

Wait a minute, what was I talking about--oh yeah, middle age. I mean, Pop-Tarts for the middle aged. We have special needs and we spend lots of money to meet them. Most of them seem to involve excretory organs--sinuses, sphincters, tubules, and various peristaltic processors. We also worry about staying young-looking. Here, then are a few varieties of Pop-Tarts for marketing to the pre-senior crowd.

Pop-Tarts Silver: These treats would be iced with shiny silver frosting and feature a filling infused with Centrum Silver elderly-person vitamins. Why swallow a pill when you can have a Pop-Tart? Pop-Tarts Silver for women might feature a girlish pink stripe, while men's Silver would be slightly scented with Old Spice.

Pop-Up Pop-Tarts: What better way to retain youthful vigor than Pop-Tarts with Viagra chips in the filling? This is a bit foul to say, but you could have your Pop-Tart and "eat it," too. Warning: Any Pop-Tart remaining rigid for longer than four hours (a life-threatening condition) should be taken to the emergency room for medically supervised deflation.

Pop-Tarts Olay: Laced with hormone replacement supplements, these delicious, slightly Olay-flavored Pop-Tarts are packaged with a dollop of Oil of Olay to keep your skin looking as young as these Pop-Tarts leave you feeling. Icing will be striped with ylang-ylang, whatever that is, because it is rumored to be rejuvenating.Co-packaged with the Pop-Up Pop-Tarts. 

Pop-Tarts DF: Yes, that DF stands for the topic most middle-aged conversations get around to: dietary fiber. The orange-flavored MetamuciTarts will keep you regular as clockwork without that dreaded gritty texture.

Pop-Tarts Natural DF: Same as above, but with wheat germ in the filling and a top studded with granola, rolled oats and perhaps pine cones. Many parts are edible. 

Dried Plum Pop-Tarts: These will be almost as popular as the DF version. Note that "dried plums" is the new way to say "prunes."

Gotta Go Pop-Tarts: This somewhat chewy toaster pastry can function as an emergency substitute for adult incontinence products. (Microwaving not recommended.)

Pop-Tart Pharming: Instead of sending your prescriptions to the mail-in drug place, you send them to the Pop-Tart Pharm bakery, which will prepare Pop-Tarts with just the right dosages of your medicines in them, blended with banana pudding filling to disguise the taste. Only problem: peeling off all those warning labels before eating.

Oxy-Pop-Tartiates: Pop-Tarts laced with popular prescription pain killers. You can start with just one very six hours and then work your way up to several a day. When you start pawning the silverware for your next "pop," you know you've got a problem. Use only as directed.

Is this enough? Have I beat this topic into a flat pasty dough yet? My conclusion: Pop-Tarts are only limited by your imagination...but unfortunately your imagination may be limited. That is all.

Addendum

Here are a couple more.

No-Ox Pop-Tarts: This flavor is chock full of anti-oxidants--fighters of those "free radicals" (such as President Obama and myself) that cause so much fuss. The filling will be pomegranate-broccoli and the icing will be a coating of that classic anti-oxidant primer-colored Rust-o-leum spray paint.

Joint Tarts: Retain heat long enough to be used on creaky joints and muscle strains. Do not apply directly onto festering wounds.

Diet Pop-Tarts: Just kidding.

The Betsy (and Eddie) Books, by Carolyn Haywood

The Betsy books, by Carolyn Haywood, were written between 1939 and 1986 for elementary school-aged girls. Haywood also wrote a series of books about a boy named Eddie and numerous "one-off" titles. The first book, "B" Is for Betsy, finds the title character about to start kindergarten. The books very much follow the school year/holiday calendar and each book is either one school year or one summer vacation.

The Betsy books communicate the ultimate American happy childhood of the mid-20th century. Nuclear family, dad working & mom at home, white people only (except for a few servants), traditional holiday celebrations, mild dramas with happy resolutions. The parents are benevolent and infinitely understanding; teachers perky and young; friends loyal. The household pets are the most entertaining and several chapters revolve around animal escapades. Betsy's friend Billy's dog is always getting something sticky dumped on him or rolling in something and the kids' efforts to clean him up always add to the mayhem. Read the chapter where the bottle of molasses gets knocked over and drips all over the dog. Another time it is pancake batter.


These books, are episodic and fast-paced and thoroughly enjoyable. Betsy has age-appropriate milestones (losing a tooth, acquiring a baby sister) and learnings (she is no longer top in her class), but they are episodes, not considered to be life crises. The books are happy and sunny and very funny. There is no real story arc.

I delight in the fact that these books (except for their utter blissfulness) are written for children, not for adults reading for children. When you are a kid, you don’t think of your life in a story arc. Breakthroughs rush toward you like waves on a beach. I think kids would really like this book. And, I reflect, adults only pretend to see their lives as having a story arc, or see the arc in hindsight and over-interpret it. The analyzed life is not the norm—it’s only the norm among book readers and writers, I think. The book readers and writers create and perpetuate a weird norm and then think everyone lives like we do!

In other books, Betsy has a watermelon party, takes a sleigh ride with Santa, enjoys various mild crises that her mild parents always turn into gentle learning experiences. Things work out for Betsy. Wrongs are righted, disappointments redeemed. The saving grace of these otherwise insipid books is the humor. The episodes are comic and the responses are variously stupid and clever (with mom and dad always ready—with the garden hose in some cases).

In addition to the element of humor, Haywood's characters are fun and likable. Although the books as a whole are pretty goody-two-shoes, the children themselves are not. They develop jealousies, make mistakes, misunderstand each other, and have the occasional hissy fit. In one book, an angry boy plays a prank on Betsy. She thinks Billy did it and starts to shun him. The crisis is resolved gently and all is forgiven. The lesson given was that you should judge by what you know about a person, not by a single incident...pretty mild. Still, the children came through as authentic--children you'd like to know.

I am concerned, though, that Betsy's world is so well drawn that kids might think it is how life is or should be. As amusement it is great, but as reality it is a bit ridiculous. Not all boo-boos (of the heart as well as body) are so easily healed or healed at all. Still, I am eager to be amused by more of the books in this series as soon as I can find them. And, the children's books that try to incorporate realism don't always work...I can easily view the Betsy books as as kind of fairy tale, fables, inculcators of community pro-social values. In that sense, they truly do their work.


A Betsy Bibliography
I used a patchwork quilt of sources to put together a sequence of the Betsy books--many of the books have been re-issued, so they have multiple publication dates. To the best of my effort, the Betsy books include the following:


"B" Is for Betsy--book 1, 1939
Betsy and Billy--book 2, 1941
Back to School with Betsy--book 3, 1943
Betsy and the Boys--book 4, 1945
Betsy's Little Star--book 5, 1950 (found 1959 also)
Betsy and the Circus--book 6, 1954
Betsy's Busy Summer--book 7, 1956
Betsy's Winterhouse--book 8, 1958
Snowbound with Betsy--book 9, 1962
Betsy and Mr. Kilpatrick--book 10, 1967
Merry Christmas from Betsy--book 11, 1970
Betsy's Play School--book 12, 1977


The Eddie Books
Carolyn Haywood's other famous series is the Eddie books. The pattern is the same, but Eddie is funnier--he's a bit eccentric, like if you combined Beaver Cleaver and Alex Keaton. My review of these Eddie books from a couple of years ago shows that my evaluations of the Betsy books hold true--likable characters, humor, and lots of animals carry the stories.

Eddie and Gardenia

Seven-year-old Eddie’s rascally goat Gardenia gets sent off to a ranch in Texas—she has chewed up one too many valuable items in the Wilson household. Eddie goes with Gardenia and is introduced to ranch life. This is a fun book, if a bit slow. Knowledge about Texas and ranches is placed didactically in the mouths of characters who otherwise say only, “sure,” “you bet,” and “howdy.” But the second half of the book is fine, when Eddie sets out on his own adventure, through which he finally earns his spurs as a real cowboy.

Eddie and his cousin Georgie are enthusiastic and enjoy roaming the range as much as the cattle, goats, and sheep. The adults are caring but allow the boys lots of freedom. They hit two major crises—the truck gets stranded in a rainstorm, and Gardenia must be rescued from a thorn bush.

It’s the relationship between Eddie and Gardenia that animates and fulfills this book. They are both likable and lively and devoted to each other. This is the first Haywood book I’ve read. There are many more Eddie books. I hope to be able to locate them and add them to this list.

Eddie’s Happenings

I think the title of this book is a nod to the counterculture movement of the 1960s and 1970s, when “happenings” began happening. A school year is the background of this book, and it centers around a calendar of obscure events that Eddie’s friend finds. They celebrate all sorts of strange stuff. The book ends in February, with a triumphant winning of the Washington’s Birthday pageant.

This book is light and fun.  A troubled character, Tookey, is introduced. He has a hard time with when to pretend and when not to. The issue is handled very matter-of-factly, which is refreshing in these days of sensitivity training and self-esteem exercises. Accepting friendship is the main solution. I enjoyed this. The book ends abruptly, as did the Gardenia book. I wonder if I read them in order if the time line would be continuous.

Style

I enjoyed discovering the various covers for the Betsy books. They are a real history of American design. I picked the best image available and didn't try to be consistent. You can see the chubby child images of the forties and fifties giving way to the well-adjusted sixties and seventies child giving way to photography. Interesting.

Among the Ruins of the Kingdom, by Douglas Hatten

A new entry in the fantasy tradition, Among the Ruins of the Kingdom, by Douglas Hatten, is fast-paced and engaging. Although it started a bit slow, I was hooked by about page 50 and after about page 150 I could not put the book down. Hatten is the cousin of my friend Maryjane Ferguson, a disclaimer that means little in terms of this review. If I had disliked the book I simply would not have reviewed it...so I'm happy to recommend this book to you. It's a touchy thing to review a book by someone you have a connection to. I admit that my tendency is to sheath my claws a bit. Enjoy!

The author, Douglas Hatten

Among the Ruins follows a standard quest format--a teenage boy is selected and identified as the champion of good versus evil. He undergoes numerous trials and contests and gathers allies and magical objects. He gains power and skill as he goes along. This is an entirely predictable formula, repeated again and again in all genres of literature and in uncounted movies and video games. Yet, it works. It still works, even when I know exactly what's going on and even when I am certain of the outcome (the hero prevails). The quest format is a comfortable template upon which to build a story and allows the reader to focus on themes and characters.

I pictured Chayim as a young
Leonard DiCaprio

In Among the Ruins, just-turned-17-year-old Chayim is forcibly diverted from his life as a peasant-scholar. His parents were told to send him for schooling because of a prophecy. Among his family and teachers, only Chayim did not know that he had a special destiny. Seventeen is the age of adulthood in Chayim's culture and his adventure starts right on his birthday--a nice touch. On his way home from school, Chayim is stalked by a shadow being and is rescued by a wizened old man who carries a walking stick--the Gandalf character. I don't think Hatten stole the idea of Gandalf from Tolkien--I just think that the wise old teacher is a fixture in quest literature. Tolkien got his Gandalf from a much older tradition.

Here's my favorite cinematic Jesus--Ted Neely
from Jesus Christ: Superstar. What might Jesus
have accomplished with a good mentor like
Gandalf?

ASIDE: It is peculiar that the ultimate quest/savior, Jesus, did not have a mentor...or his mentor was lost in the retelling. So much of quest literature is based in Christianity...somehow the mentor character survived his/her exclusion from the Christian story. The disciples were clearly subordinate to Jesus, not advisers or teachers. I'm not a Christian scholar...are there versions of the Jesus story that indicate a mentor? In a sense, I guess his dad was his mentor, except maybe without a walking stick. Please comment if you have feedback on this.

Aragorn had a romance--and a hot French
kiss you can see if you watch the scene in
super slow-mo. Lucky couple!

Anyway, when the mentor, Zidek, rescues Chayim, the adventure begins. Chayim, with the help of various friends and powers, must somehow collect the armor of a great king, which will allow him to prevail in a great battle between good and evil...and bring back the great king (a reference to the second coming of Jesus?) and a time of peace. I will not go into the plot here--don't want to risk any spoilers--but danger, courage, discouragement, betrayal, violence, victory, and love are a part of it. We watch as Chayim grows into his hero role. And, a romance is provided for him, which makes him a tad luckier than Jesus and Frodo!

A thick forest is one of the memorable locations
of Among the Ruins

Hatten presents a coherent worldview for his fantasy--a set of sacred texts, spiritual practices, initiates and intiators. The history of the kingdom is fully present in the present, which is a nice thing. As a reader, I had a strong sense of Chayim's heritage and traditions. This increased the plausibility of the book. The sensory detail was sparse--a polar opposite from Tolkien--and yet I had a physical sense of place. And certainly after Chapter 1, I was fully engaged in this world and retain it as a place I have visited.

The main philosophical question in Among the Ruins seemed to be the conflict between predestination and free will. The author worked hard to reconcile these two ideas...repeatedly and often. Several times, Chayim questions his role in the drama...does his free will mean anything at all in the face of living out a prophecy that was written millenia ago? The issue is not resolved to my satisfaction, but then I am a free will sort of person. I don't believe that "it is written" until I've written it.

My favorite scenes were those in which Chayim felt the pull of the power of creation. In a Joseph Campbell sense, he was open to allurement and followed its energy. Anyway, when the pull started, I knew something amazing was going to happen--an amazing dragon, a display of superhuman powers, some sort of magic. I loved that. And I loved the idea of ancient portals--short cuts--that would open if Chayim would synchronize with the power.

My main problem with this book is that it could use a good copy edit. I'm pretty fussy about grammar and spelling and usage and such, and maybe I'm just old-fashioned. But one of the reasons I would like a major publisher to pick up and publish this terrific book is that they would give it a serious structural edit and a copy edit. I came across "parameter" used for "perimeter" (twice!), and "its/it's" used improperly, and "suites" used for "suits,"  and many other bits of carelessness. I think a good editor would also pep up the opening chapters of the book and jump the reader right into the action.

I will be buying book two of this series probably today. Why don't you go and buy book 1? You'll find it for sale at:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/douglas-hatten/among-the-ruins-of-the-kingdom/paperback/product-18837230.html

I Am in Every Spring

Snowbells in the yard

Today I have faith that spring is here. The landscape looks a bit greener, the breeze a bit fresher, the sun a bit milder. Three big patches of snowbells brighten up parts of the lawn. The buds on the lilac bushes have swollen to the point of showing a hint of green leaves.

The most stunning change is in the number and noise of birds. Six fat robins were trilling at each other in my front yard, each of the three pairs sound-marking some territory. My big sugar maple will function, I hope, as a robin apartment building. Surely there is enough room for all. Right now it is a building under construction--just the frame/branches without the leaves/drywall.

Sugar maple in early spring

Out here at work, a robin pecks the mulch outside my window every morning. He or she is plump and sleek, fluffed out for r-value against the chill. Peck. Peck. Flick. Grab. Swallow. Down the hatch goes a grub. There's a pond out here and evergreens around it--more a subdivision for birds than my maple apartment building.

One time when I was camping with a random group of people one of them guided us through listening for birds...he had us attend to the gradual increase in the number and diversity of songs as we ourselves quieted down. And, speaking softly, he encouraged us to stretch out our hearing, to listen for the sounds behind the sounds...and a multilayered orchestration of birds emerged. I've never forgotten this lesson in listening--listening with depth perception.

American robin

Out here at work, we've got a wind tunnel going--the exhaust fans in the shop suck air under the front door all day long, creating a moaning, mournful sound that makes me think of the song "Shenandoah." The brisk wind then sweeps the despair along...get along, sorrow...get along, woe.

I ordered plants--dozens of periwinkle seedlings to start a ground cover under the new shrubs I planted last fall. My fingers itch to dig in the soil. Maybe a new trowel is in order. And I am about to order a huge load of river rock to landscape on the dry, shady side of the house. Then I can put in some daffodil bulbs to come up among the bare rocks in the spring. And then I think I'll get a load of white gravel to make a peace sign in the middle.

Daffodil growing among rocks

Oh that we could all live on the cusp of change like the seasons do. There is never a time when nature is not becoming something else; transitioning; more ebbing and more flowing than the tides. It's us, us humans, that think somehow that a condition can be frozen, that for a certain period of time it will "be" spring or "be" summer when truly summer is always becoming from spring and becoming into fall. I always thought there would be a time when I would "be" grown up and that I would recognize that condition and...and...stop becoming.

The seeds of my old age were in my youth and now in middle age the seeds of youth are still sprouting alongside the seeds of aging and death. I'm every season, every age, every day.

Morels--an Appalachian treat

I was going to say that only in death does the becoming cease, but in nature there is not even death. My body will continue to change until it is unrecognizable except for its presence in every other living thing. I am released to new possibilities. Becoming and becoming...I can't get around it. Spring comes every year, but it is not the same spring. It's a new spring. And it's an old spring. And every spring has me in it. And always did. And always will.

Podkayne of Mars by Robert Heinlein

Nowhere in the book is it
suggested that Podkayne
dresses like this.

I regret that the mighty Heinlein has struck out. So far I have greatly enjoyed every Heinlein book I’ve read until this one. With Podkayne of Mars (1963), Heinlein breaks many other patterns as well. The hero, Podkayne, is a girl. She is not in the military or in training for that. The book involves a political intrigue that Podkayne is only tangentially connected to. I have to admit, though, that by the end of the book, I liked it. I had to put aside my “modern” womanist values and be patient (book is quite slow up until the last 50 pages) in order to see the charm of this book.

Podkayne is 16 years old and is from Mars, though of Swedish/Maori descent (!). Her life on Mars is pretty tame, livened up by a bratty genius brother. At the beginning of the book she is committed to becoming a space explorer, piloting her own ship out into the universe. In the course of the book, however, she “grows up” and realizes that maybe she could just be a crew member on a ship…piloted by her husband…at least until she devotes herself to motherhood. In the crisis that develops in the plot, it is the genius brother who saves the day and in fact he takes over the first person narrative that has been in Podkayne’s words all along. Podkayne’s voice is taken away. The old Podkayne is pretty much burned to a crisp…she didn’t follow her brother’s orders.

These harsh lessons are learned as Podkayne goes on her first interplanetary journey. She is supposed to go from Mars to Venus to Earth. She doesn’t make it to Earth, so I don’t know why it was even in the book. The plot self-aborts on Venus. There is some cool science in the book, like how to plan an interplanetary journey given the various orbits and rates of rotation of the various space bodies. There’s also a somewhat obligatory sequence of everyone in the space ship cooped up in a radiation shelter during a solar flare event. I’m glad Heinlein allowed for the existence of solar flares, but the main lesson that Podkayne learned was that taking care of babies in space would be more fun than being a pilot.

The lengthy diaper-changing-in-space sequence was somewhat preposterous, especially given the careful science with which Heinlein treats space travel. No mention of feces and urine flying free in the low-grav environment or of the diapers themselves floating off en masse. There is mention of baby vomit spheres floating around but other rules of gravity seemed to cover poop and pee. Burping the babies was not discussed. This part of the book makes me value more highly than ever the invention of Velcro--you could really nail those babies down with Velcro.

I was shocked by the unbridled sexualness
of almost every image that came up for the
search "girls in space."

Podkayne is a typical 1960s teenage girl, a bit vain, worried about clothes and boys. Her science-orientation sets her apart until her conversion to traditional womanhood later in the book. It is the broadening effect of traveling to other planets that helps her see the error of her ways. Her mother, a famous engineer responsible for the terraforming of whole moons and the establishment of civilizations thereupon is criticized in the end for not spending enough time with her children…her neglect is seen as responsible for Podkayne’s insufficient attachment to infants.



Heinlein went with the cannister
model of spaceship



I am not upset with this book. It is just funny now and majorly out of date, as it should be 50 years later. I had more trouble with its slow pace. A hundred pages of roaming around a space ship preceded the 40 or so where the plot actually happened. The word “dithering” comes to mind.

 Hei

I’m sure Heinlein faced some pressure to write a girl’s book. This book, though, seems high-jacked in the middle, veering into a different book altogether. I would love to know the story of the writing of this book.

Sci-fi and the Status Quo


I did not add the circle. Later in the series
Troi's hemlines dropped, but then her
neckline also did.



Science fiction almost always reinforces the status quo, even as it claims to go beyond any known world. Traditional (antiquated) sex roles almost always prevail, even in the most up-to-date sci-fi with the most liberal values--I’m thinking of Counselor Troi’s wardrobe from Star Trek Next Gen.

The 21^st century Battlestar Galactica finally pushed back on these stereotypes and it broke open all sorts of amazing possibilities. The crucial moment was the decision to cast ace pilot Starbuck as a woman. But generally, women are passive nurturers in science fiction--the same role they are cast in in most portrayals in film, TV, and literature. Being a female sci-fi fan is a hard road to travel.



Starbuck



Another thing I appreciated about Battlestar Galactica was that they didn’t focus on an “alien creature of the week.” There were no Klingons or Vulcans. Because, you know, if there are other sentient life forms out there in space, they are not at all likely to be close together. We probably won’t encounter them in any near-earth neighborhood. Battlestar Galactica saw space as bleak and empty, hostile to life. (And, of course, there are amazing implausibilities in Battlestar Galactica--I simply choose to ignore them in this blog post.)

Images of Women in Science Fiction
 Princess Leia
 Katniss
 Nurse Chapel
Hermione--regular, prom
 Linda Hamilton from Terminator
 President Rosslyn of Battlestar Gallactica
 Tasha Yar of Star Trek NexGen
Starship Troopers, another Heinlein title

The Witch of Blackbird Pond, by Elizabeth George Speare

At its most basic, The Witch of Blackbird Pond, by Elizabeth George Speare, follows the pattern of a fairy tale. The main character is forced to wander from her home, enters a world where all the rules are different and strange (to her), undergoes trials and tests, grows up a lot, then resolves it all in a happily-ever-after marital conclusion.

The fairy tale ending was a bit disappointing, given the imaginative setting and wonderful characterizations of this book, but seems appropriate for a book published in 1958. In fact, for 1958, the hero of this book is wonderfully imagined--her inner life is rich and she faces the epic conflicts of all great heroes--sacrifice vs. safety, self vs. community, self vs. family, right vs. wrong, freedom vs. duty, and so many more. This book reads as current--I had many ideas as to when it was written. It's a fine book--interesting and, in the best sense, sweet.

Blackbird Pond follows Kit Tyler as she flees her home in Barbados--colorful, urban, lush--and arrives in cold and stony colonial Connecticut, home of her only living relative, an aunt. The discovery of the New England landscape, its charms and perils, is one key feature of the book. A second key feature is Kit's introduction to the culture of Puritanism in the 1680s--diametrically opposite to almost all she has been taught. The third key feature is Kit's submersion in self-subsistance (work, in other words). These three strands are interesting all in themselves. Seeing the landscape, culture, and work through Kit's new eyes illuminated it for me, made the Puritan period way more three-dimensional than I had viewed it before.

And then there's witchcraft. Kit is first suspected of being a witch as her ship from Barbados comes into port. A child drops her doll into the water and Kit jumps in and swims out to get it. Scandalous. People in New England, apparently, do not swim. Kit, if she fears not the water, might be a witch. Witches float. Kit is a peculiar bird in the Connecticut aviary. For example, she has no work clothes, she can't cook or sew, and she doesn't understand silent obedience. Against her uncle's direct order, Kit develops a relationship with an old woman considered to be a witch in the community, which casts yet more suspicion upon her. The old woman is a Quaker (another peculiar bird).

Anyway, Kit's characteristics put her at odds with the community; her actions put her and others in danger. The fairy tale ending is a bit of a cop out because Kit's marriage will remove her from the Puritan community and give her back most of the freedoms she had been denied. So, did she change and grow? Yes. And this is a children's book, so a portrayal of a lifetime as a questionable outsider is not feasible. I just worry that the fairy tale ending short circuits Kit as a true hero in the hero journey sense. The book is weakened by this, I think, made ordinary when it could have been great.

I don't think I've ever read a book set in this time period before, depicting village life in a Puritan community. It is interesting to see the seedlings of independence being sown, grown, and nurtured. The Puritans feared they would lose their autonomy when Charles II restored the British monarchy and actively prepared to resist. I never understood that before...that tradition of self-determination. And I never understood that Puritans and Quakers pretty much hated each other, resulting in severe persecution of Quakers. Kit's friend in the story had been branded.

This book is a Newbery Medal winner for good reason. You'll feel, like I did, like you've traveled through time and space to an alien land where the shape of the nation to come is just beginning to emerge.